GUIDELINES TO SELF-CARE TO TRANSPLANTED PATIENTS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW

Ana Beatriz Castro Gonçalves, Amanda Alves dos Santos, Beatriz Sousa Vasconcelos, Gabriela Oliveira Alves, Isabella Maria Leite e Silva, Jéssica Silva da Costa, Laís Manuela Borges Ribeiro, Katielle Bezerra da Silva, Mariana Lôbo Moreira, Michel Galeno Leles Santana, Sarah Pinho Bezerra, Tales Mateus Vieira da Rocha, Tatiane Oliveira Ferraz, Dayani Galato

Abstract


The main of this research is to investigate self-care orientations related to the patient’s feeding, the presence of pets, the sun protection, and the vaccines use by immunosuppressive transplant patients, as the purpose of seeking information and qualifying them regarding the degree of evidence and level of recommendation. For this, a narrative review study was conducted on the topics: feeding, domestic animals, sun protection, and vaccines. We performed the review through the selection of descriptors and searches in databases such as PubMed, as well as guidelines related to the transplant or immunosuppressive patients. The studies present a few recommendation grades and evidence level, maybe due to the ethical situation. The degree of recommendation and level of evidence were adopted according to the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. The patient’s feeding may be based on well-sourced, sanitized, well-cooked foods. This kind of patients might prefer fresh food. As for domestic animals such as cats, dogs, and birds they are allowed under hygienic and vaccination conditions. Exotic pets such as ducks, chickens, hamsters, and reptiles they are not recommended. The use of sunscreens is recommended to prevent the development of skin cancer. For the patients transplanted, only vaccines produced by the inactivated agent are indicated. The information identifi ed has a low level of recommendation and evidence, which may be related to ethical issues. The recommendations presented, despite the low evidence level and recommendation grade, are essential for preventing complications in transplant and immunosuppressive patients, and the classifi cation of evidence adopted is of a substantial diff erence in this research. 


Keywords


organ transplantation, self-care, immunosuppression, feeding, sunscreening agents, vaccines, animals, domestic



DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14450/2318-9312.v32.e3.a2020.pp179-191

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Beatriz Castro Gonçalves, Amanda Alves dos Santos, Beatriz Sousa Vasconcelos, Gabriela Oliveira Alves, Isabella Maria Leite e Silva, Jéssica Silva da Costa, Laís Manuela Borges Ribeiro, Katielle Bezerra da Silva, Mariana Lôbo Moreira, Michel Galeno Leles Santana, Sarah Pinho Bezerra, Tales Mateus Vieira da Rocha, Tatiane Oliveira Ferraz, Dayani Galato

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Infarma - Ciências Farmacêuticas

ISSN - 2318-9312 (Versão eletrônica)

ISSN - 0104-0219 (Versão impressa)

Conselho Federal de Farmácia - CFF

SHIS QI 15 Lote "L" - Lago Sul - Brasília - DF

CEP: 71635-615 - Fone: (61)3878-8751

e-mail:infarma@cff.org.br

Diretoria

Walter da Silva Jorge João, Presidente do Conselho Federal de Farmácia

Lenira da Silva Costa, Vice-Presidente do Conselho Federal de Farmácia

João Samuel de Morais Meira, Tesoureiro do Conselho Federal de Farmácia

Luiz Gustavo de Freitas Pires, Secretário-Geral do Conselho Federal de Farmácia